SSCA Shreyans Shah ← All insights
Home  /  Insights  /  Section 9 for Operational Creditors
Operational Creditors

Section 9 of the IBC: how operational creditors file for insolvency

By CA Shreyans Shah · IBBI-registered Insolvency Professional (IRP/RP/Liquidator) · Surat

Suppliers, service providers, contractors and employees — the IBC calls them operational creditors, and it gives them their own route to trigger a corporate insolvency when invoices go unpaid. But the Section 9 route has a strict pre-condition and one famous trap: the pre-existing dispute. Here's how the process actually works.

Who is an operational creditor?

An operational creditor is owed an operational debt — a claim arising from the provision of goods or services (including employment), or statutory dues owed to the government. This is distinct from a financial creditor, whose debt arises from money lent against consideration for the time value of money. The distinction decides which section you file under — financial creditors use Section 7; operational creditors must follow the two-step Section 8 + Section 9 route.

Step 1 — The Section 8 demand notice

Before anything reaches the NCLT, the operational creditor must deliver a demand notice to the corporate debtor:

The debt must meet the ₹1 crore minimum default threshold. The notice is best delivered to the registered office (and by email to key managerial personnel) with proof of delivery preserved — service of the notice is routinely contested at admission.

Step 2 — The 10-day window

The corporate debtor then has 10 days to do one of two things:

Step 3 — The Section 9 application

If the 10 days pass with no payment and no valid notice of dispute, the operational creditor files the application before the NCLT in Form 5, accompanied by the invoice or other proof of debt, an affidavit that no notice of dispute was received, and — where available — a confirmation from the creditor's bank that the amount remains unpaid. The applicant may also propose a Resolution Professional (it is optional for a Section 9 filing).

The Mobilox test — where Section 9 applications die

In Mobilox Innovations v. Kirusa Software (2018), the Supreme Court held that if a plausible, pre-existing dispute exists — one that is not "spurious, hypothetical or illusory" — the NCLT must reject the Section 9 application. The tribunal does not decide who would win the dispute; it only checks that a genuine dispute exists. This is the single most common reason operational-creditor applications fail. Before filing, audit your own correspondence: quality complaints, debit notes, contested reconciliations — anything the debtor raised before your demand notice can defeat the application.

Admission and what follows

If the application is complete, the debt is due, and no pre-existing dispute exists, the NCLT admits the application — CIRP commences, the moratorium takes effect, and an IRP takes charge of the company. From there the process is the same as any CIRP: claims, the Committee of Creditors, resolution plans or liquidation.

What operational creditors should know before filing

Unpaid operational dues — or served with a Section 8 notice?

I advise operational creditors and corporate debtors on demand notices, Section 9 strategy and NCLT filings.

Get in touch
CA Shreyans Shah
Written by CA Shreyans Shah

Chartered Accountant, CFA L1 & IBBI-registered Insolvency Professional (IRP/RP/Liquidator). Founding Partner, Vista Solvency LLP — 100+ CIRP, liquidation, personal-guarantor & bankruptcy matters across NCLT benches. Surat · Ahmedabad · Mumbai.

Connect on LinkedIn →